This is what every RacqI answer stands on — chosen by hand, not scraped. A curated body of evidence — some indexed and ready, some fetched the moment a question needs it — read by an engine that grounds every answer and never guesses. Every channel is human-selected, evidence-tiered and classified.
Where no curated source fits, the answer says so — rather than filling the gap. How an answer is built
RacqI knows not only who operates a venue, but what kind of operator runs it. Pricing, utilisation, opening hours and capital requirement differ completely between them — a school hall and a commercial centre two streets apart are not the same competition.
A directory sees two venues. We see two different businesses.
Where the operating basis is established, the calculation counts the venue as what it actually is. Where it is not, the answer flags the venue instead of assuming a category.
Stored, searchable by meaning and by exact term.
Every part of the base is human-curated: chosen deliberately, gathered over years, checked by people who know what the material is worth — and in part not publicly available at all. None of it is a scrape. Someone had to decide the rules.
Studies, standards and hand-read regulation — the fine print that decides a permit or a subsidy, which a crawler skips.
Selected by hand over years. Part of it is not publicly accessible.
The venue, the operator behind it and what kind of operator they are — commercial, municipal, non-profit, club, school, academy — with sports, court counts, pricing, positioning, programming and format mix.
Official registers, statistical offices and supranational bodies — consolidated, de-duplicated, verified, then enriched venue by venue. Not purchased market data.
CapEx ratios, standards and density baselines distilled from decades of operating experience — available in no report or dataset.
Curated by practitioners. Specific know-how, in a quality and quantity available nowhere else.
A capable team can build a data-driven vertical agent. What cannot be compressed is what sits beneath it: a facility database assembled by hand over years, regulation read page by page, benchmarks that come from four decades of operating rather than from any dataset.
Operator classification is the clearest example. Nothing on a website states whether a venue is run for profit, for members or for pupils. Establishing that reliably — across countries, languages and legal forms — is interpretation, not extraction. It is exactly the kind of judgement that only exists where sector expertise and engineering sit in the same organisation.
Refreshed live or curated daily, never stale.
Authoritative connectors for demographics, economy, climate, catchment and accessibility — Eurostat, the World Bank, WorldPop, GHS/Copernicus, NASA POWER, OpenStreetMap and more — pulled at the moment a question needs them, sub-municipal where it exists.
Fired per question, reaching wider than the base already holds whenever a topic calls for it.
The paywalled, un-crawlable reporting plain search can't reach — monitored and refreshed daily, human-verified before it enters the base.
The right engine per question: some reason, some search, some summarise.
We use AI to open up knowledge — not to invent it.
The machine reads, verifies and connects what nobody could read in reasonable time. The statement at the end comes from the calculation and from the Institute’s benchmarks — not from the language model.
The math runs off the model, on a dedicated engine over structured data. The answer reads the result; it never performs the arithmetic itself.
Every answer sourced and ranked by evidence tier; where no curated source fits, it flags that instead of bluffing.
A review step re-checks evidence, numbers and rules — and corrects itself — before you ever see the answer.
Curation cannot be crawled. It has to be chosen.
Why the base is built by handThe method is academic, and so is the scrutiny: a thesis at Bocconi University in Milan examines how RacqI performs on real racquet-sports decision questions compared with general-purpose assistants such as ChatGPT and Claude. Same questions, same conditions, assessed on the criteria that decide whether an answer is usable: is every figure sourced, is the reasoning traceable, does it hold in the specific market — and does it say when the evidence runs out.
Bocconi University, Milan — an academic thesis, not a vendor benchmark.
RacqI against general-purpose assistants on identical questions.
Does a curated evidence base measurably change the quality of the decision?
Study in progress — results shared when complete
Pre-beta access is live, arranged individually. Commercial launch October 2026.
Racquet Sports Intelligence. The connected data space for the racquet sports ecosystem — five sports, 220+ countries. Sourced, calculated, or named. Never guessed.